Guns in churches has been the popular conversation piece in churches lately due to recent violence in a Texas Church. There are some great conversations going on around the issue but there are some terrible ones also. This post is not going to present an opinion on which view is correct. Instead, it will focus on the basis of a certain argument for either side.
The most disturbing argument is about self defense or personal safety. This is a very common argument on both sides and it extends to many different aspects of ethics. The basis of the argument is that if anything threatens the self or whatever the self values, then that is a justification for any action to defend the self or what the self values, no matter how violent. The problem with this way of processing ethics is that it uses the self as a basis for defining our actions. Ethics is not how we relate to ourselves. It deals with how we relate to others. Christian ethics makes this obvious thought the words of Christ and the Early Church. The Sermon on the Mount alone is a prime example. To have a good ethic, we must ask questions that go further than our own selves and deals with the Christian call to take the Kingdom into this world.
The issues of weapons in churches, for example, is nothing new. The first Christians had to deal with a hostile environment that went well beyond a man coming in the front doors and killing people. They did not focus on what happened to their own lives, but asked questions about what God wanted. This led them to their own conclusions for their own time. Justin Martyr (ca. 160 A.D) said, “We who formerly murdered one another now refrain from making war even upon our enemies.” Another Early Church Father, Tertulian (ca. 197 A.D.) said, “The Christian does no harm even to his enemy.” These two and many other early church figures asked deeper questions than how do I defend myself or those I love. They were also not worried about simply being safe by avoiding violence. If it came, they would be ready and would live out the witness of Christ to their violent oppressors.
Once again, I will not say in this post which side I am on. I only want people to think more about the implications of what they are saying. I will say that if you only use self defense in any way as the basis for your ethics when it comes to violence, you are not looking closely at scripture. You need to go deeper. You might end up at a conclusion where stopping an action through lethal force is allowed, albeit rare. As long as you have sat in prayer, mediated on Scriptures and the message of Jesus to individuals and His community of believers, and worked logically through the right questions, you can then claim a sound ethical position.